Legal Opinion

Gray v. Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 25, 1998No. 95-8459PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before the court on remand from the United States Supreme Court for further consideration of our earlier opinion in light of Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1890, 141 L.Ed.2d 102 (1998). In accord with the Court’s opinion, we reverse our previous holding that appellees may recover damages for pain and suffering on their survival action claims based on general maritime law in conjunction with the Death on the High Seas Act, 46 U.S.C.App. §§ 761-768. See Gray v. Lockheed Aeronautical Sys. Co., 125 F.3d 1371, 1381-86 (11th Cir.1997). We affirm the remainder…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Gray v. Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vo v. Yamaha Golf Car Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Stacy C. Gray, Individually and as Surviving Spouse of Lt. Douglas G. Gray, and as Personal Representative of Lt. Douglas G. Gray, Deceased v. Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company, a Division of Lockheed Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Grace M. Schumacher, Individually and as Surviving Parent of Lt. John T. Hartman, and as Personal Representative of Lt. John Hartman, Deceased v. Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company, a Division of Lockheed Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Wilma J. Jennings, Individually, and as Surviving Parent of Lt. David S. Jennings, and as Personal Representative of Lt. David S. Jennings, Deceased v. Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company, a Division of Lockheed Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API