Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Oertling

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 2, 1912No. 19,667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by J. H. Fulton and another, liquidators of the Cranor Lumber Company, against Frederick N. Oertling and another. Application by the defendant Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance Company for writs of certiorari and prohibition.

1Opinion of the CourtSommeryille, J.

Relator, one of the defendants in this cause, alleges: That this suit was brought via ordinaria against Frederick N. Oertling, a mortgage debtor and principal defendant, residing in the parish of Orleans, to have recognized a mortgage given by him to secure a part of the purchase price of certain property in Washington parish, La., bought by Oertling from the Cranor Lumber Company; the mortgage notes being held by plaintiffs.

That in plaintiffs’ petition they further allege that defendant Oertling had entered into a second contract with some third persons to cut the timber on the mortgaged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. Phelps v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Gravier v. BaronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  5. Hayden v. Yale & BowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stamper v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Marine Bank & Trust Co. v. ShafferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API