Legal Opinion

English & Co. v. Thorn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 12, 1895PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton county. June 18, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

It appears from the record, that Thorn brought in the city court of Atlanta an action against English & Company upon a written contract which in its terms was plain and unambiguous. Treating the contract as meaning precisely what it expressed, the plaintiff was entitled to recover a certain amount. The defendants, however, filed in the city court a plea in which they alleged, in substance, that the instrument sued upon did not correctly express the real and true contract made and entered into between the parties; but that in reducing the same to writing, a mutual mistake was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Bank v. CarltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Byrd v. Campbell Printing-Press & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Bridger v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. House v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Fowler v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Cobb v. ParnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API