Legal Opinion

Cougar Sport, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Barry A. Cozier, J.

In this insurance coverage dispute, defendant insurance carrier moves, pursuant to CPLR 3212, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that exclusions in the insurance policy bar plaintiff’s recovery. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, the motion is granted.

Factual Allegations

Plaintiff commenced this breach of contract action against its insurance company on or about December 16, 1998, after defendant denied coverage for plaintiff’s loss. At all relevant times, plaintiff was an importer of children’s wearing apparel. Plaintiff’s goods were manufactured…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. AnnunziataNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Abrams v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Freedman v. Queen InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Facet Industries, Inc. v. WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American National Fire Insurance v. Mirasco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. United Specialty Insurance v. Barry Inn Realty Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Warehouse Wines & Spirits v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Superior Steel Studs, Inc. v. Zurich North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  5. Warehouse Wines & Spirits, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API