Legal Opinion

Hinson v. Hinson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 10, 2000No. 3212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Steve Jarrett Hinson (the husband) brought this action for separate support and maintenance against Marsha Floyd Hinson (the wife). The wife answered and counterclaimed, seeking alimony, equitable division of marital property, and attorney fees. The wife appeals the sufficiency of the family court’s award of alimony and the court’s refusal to amend its order to provide for disposition of potential casualty insurance proceeds arising from a post-trial fire which destroyed the marital home. We affirm as modified.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The parties married in November 1985 and separated in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lide v. LideSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Beamer v. BeamerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Morse v. MorseCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Corrigan v. Aetna Life & CasualtyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Bojilov v. BojilovCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  3. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  4. In re the Marriage of MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API