Legal Opinion

Hart v. Howell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 3, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRELL, J.:

This habeas corpus proceeding was brought by Sherman W. Howell, appellee, against Jim Hart and his wife, Miggie W. Hart, appellants, to secure the custody of James Farrell Howell, a minor, nine years of age. The trial court awarded his custody to the appellants during the school term of each year and to Sherman W. Howell during vacation. This appeal is from that award.

So the rightful custody of James Farrell Howell, is the only question with which we are concerned. This Court has so repeatedly adjudicated the custody of a minor child to be in the natural parent, all things being…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sparks v. ReevesSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Ritsi v. RitsiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Application of AltmillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Frye v. FryeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. McIntyre v. McIntyreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API