Jackson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Rehearing
2Per curiam
We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following in its place.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. He claims that his sentence of thirty years, imposed for carjacking and armed burglary of a conveyance, was vindictive pursuant to North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2089 (1969), because it was imposed after a retrial upon the reversal of his original conviction and original sentence of two concurrent terms of fifteen years plus probation.1 We affirm. A…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Concepcion v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Graham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- John Kimble v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021