Tosa Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this action has moved for an order compelling the defendant to answer certain interrogatories submitted to it pursuant to Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendant has countered with a motion which seeks a protective order under Rule 26(c).
The complaint alleges that the defendant has violated certain provisions of the Robinson-Patman Act by establishing “price rebate,” or “sales incentive,” programs whose terms and conditions effectively preclude the plaintiff’s participation in them. The defendant’s practices,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Local 342, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. TRW, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1966
- Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Lever Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- National Utility Service, Inc. v. Wisconsin Centrifugal Foundry, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970