Clark v. Wilcklow
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Monroe county. Action by Charles H. Clark and others against William Wilcklow and others. From an order denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendants before trial, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.
The action was on a written agreement, which the complaint alleges was executed on the part of the defendants, in the name of' "The Sanitas Soap Vase Co., by William Wilcklow, Manager,” for services to be performed by the plaintiffs for the defendants; and, on information and belief, that the -.defendants were partners in business under the firm name of *44the Sanitas Soap Vase Company. The answer denies the copartership, and denies that the two defendants other than Wilcklow had any interest in the business or in the contract mentioned. The affidavit upon which the order in question was…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Oshinsky v. GumbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919