Legal Opinion

Estate of Klosterman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 10, 1992No. Docket No. 27652-89Published

At the time of his death, D owned farmland in Idaho. The farmland is situated in two irrigation districts, which are political subdivisions of the State of Idaho. The parties agree that the farmland is to be valued pursuant to sec. 2032A(e)(7)(A), I.R.C.

Read the full summary

At the time of his death, D owned farmland in Idaho. The farmland is situated in two irrigation districts, which are political subdivisions of the State of Idaho. The parties agree that the farmland is to be valued pursuant to sec. 2032A(e)(7)(A), I.R.C. Pursuant to sec. 2032A(e)(7)(A), the value of farmland is established by computing the "average annual gross cash rental" for comparable farmland in the area for the 5-year period preceding the decedent's death, subtracting from such average rentals the average State and local real estate taxes for the same period, and dividing the result by…

1Opinion of the Court

Estate of Walter F. Klosterman, Deceased, Kent Klosterman and Alan Klosterman, Personal Representatives, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Estate of Klosterman v. Commissioner

Docket No. 27652-89

United States Tax Court

99 T.C. 313; 1992 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 71; 99 T.C. No. 16;

September 10, 1992, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

At the time of his death, D owned farmland in Idaho. The farmland is situated in two irrigation districts, which are political subdivisions of the State of Idaho. The parties agree that the farmland is to be valued pursuant to sec.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Noon v. Gem Irr. Dist.District Court, D. Idaho · 1913
  3. Noble v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  4. Estate of Klosterman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API