Legal Opinion

Siorek v. Zablocki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated December 15, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment, entered January 27, 1998, upon his default in answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established both a reasonable excuse for his default in interposing an answer and a meritorious defense (see, Hinderer v Erbesh, 240 AD2d 707; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568). Therefore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roussodimou v. ZafiriadisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Hinderer v. ErbeshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erdheim v. DeutschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Siorek v. ZablockiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API