Legal Opinion

Sant v. Baril

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1977No. 13180PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

This appeal arises out of two causes of action which were consolidated for trial by jury in the district court, Madison County. The first cause is a suit for damages under a land lease executed between lessors, A. R. Smith and Laura Smith, and lessee Arthur H. Sant. This suit was brought by Arthur H. Sant and Edna Sant (Sants), against the Administratrix of the Estate of A. R. Smith (Administratrix). Plaintiffs appeal from the district court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss, after plaintiffs presented their case and rested.

The second cause is a suit to recover on a promissory note held…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pickett v. KygerMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Haugen v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. Collins v. ItohMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. McIntosh v. Linder-Kind Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. First National Bank of Twin Bridges v. SantMontana Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Boehm v. Alanon ClubMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Semenza v. LeitzkeMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. JOHNSTON v. STACYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API