Legal Opinion

Baribault v. Robertson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 6, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The plaintiff’s lien being valid in Massachusetts where it was created will be enforced in this state, although the conditional sale agreement was not recorded (Dorntee Casket Co. v. Gunnison, 69 N. H. 297; Goudie v. Company, 81 N. H. 88); and, being prior in time, takes precedence over the defendants’ lien. Sargent v. Usher, 55 N. H. 287.

There is nothing in the language of the conditional sale agreement which would justify a contrary conclusion. Clearly, a covenant by the purchaser that he will give the seller forty-eight hours notice before having any work done on the automobile involves no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hammond v. DanielsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Guaranty Security Corp. v. BrophyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glowski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. New Hampshire Finance Corp. v. LaMarcheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  3. Universal Credit Co. v. SpinazzoloSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API