United States v. Brainerd
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
At Law. Actions by the United States against Ezra Brainerd, Jr., and others, against W. T. Ward and others, and against R. H. Matthews and others, referees in bankruptcy and their bondsmen. On demurrers to the petitions.
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
The above-entitled and numbered cases are each and all actions at law brought by the United States in its own right and title to recover from defendants therein named, the same be-ing the referees in bankruptcy duly qualified and acting in the respective referee, divisions'of this district, and their bondsmen, sums of money allowed to and collected by said referees out of estates in bankruptcy by them being administered under either general or special orders in bankruptcy proceedings made by the presiding judge of this court, which said amounts so charged, collected,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. San Jacinto Tin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. SmelserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. SmelserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937