Legal Opinion
Yorkshire Insurance v. Cravey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 3, 1960No. 38505PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
A bond executed in compliance with a regulation authorized by statute will be interpreted in the light of the regulation. Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 100 Ga. App. 727 (112 S. E. 2d 323); Talmadge v. General Casualty Co., 88 Ga. App. 234 (76 S. E. 2d 562). A plaintiff must show a right to maintain an action against the defendant. Hill v. Shaw, 189 Ga. 294 (5 S. E. 2d 778); National Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. McGann, 170 Ga. 573 (153 S. E. 362).
The bond in question was made in compliance with a regulation of the Insurance Commissioner issued under the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Small Quarries Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Hobbs v. HollimanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Southeastern Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- American Thread Co. v. RochesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Georgia, Ashburn, Sylvester & Camilla Railway Co. v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Wheeler v. Satilla Rural Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Treadway v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961