Legal Opinion
Kipp v. Agee
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 1969No. 3709PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE
Paul Kipp brought an action for declaratory judgment and for anticipatory damages in connection with a real estate contract. Under the contract Kipp had agreed to purchase land in Teton County from Thomas E. Agee and wife and H. W. Mul-lendore and wife, who were named as defendants.
Kipp’s suit calls for an interpretation of that part of the sales agreement which reads:
“That portion of H.E.S. 193, Sec. 14, T. 39 N., R. 116 W., described as follows: That portion of the above mentioned H.E.S. 193 lying easterly of HWY. 187 and northerly of Horse Creek, EXCEPT * * *. (Property contains…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beaver v. Estate of HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Pepper v. EvansonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Barnard v. Cedar Rapids City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- State Highway Commission of Wyoming v. Triangle Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Sheridan Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Lawrence v. City of RawlinsWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Kipp v. AgeeWyoming Supreme Court · 1969