Legal Opinion

Kipp v. Agee

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1969No. 3709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

Paul Kipp brought an action for declaratory judgment and for anticipatory damages in connection with a real estate contract. Under the contract Kipp had agreed to purchase land in Teton County from Thomas E. Agee and wife and H. W. Mul-lendore and wife, who were named as defendants.

Kipp’s suit calls for an interpretation of that part of the sales agreement which reads:

“That portion of H.E.S. 193, Sec. 14, T. 39 N., R. 116 W., described as follows: That portion of the above mentioned H.E.S. 193 lying easterly of HWY. 187 and northerly of Horse Creek, EXCEPT * * *. (Property contains…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beaver v. Estate of HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pepper v. EvansonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Barnard v. Cedar Rapids City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. State Highway Commission of Wyoming v. Triangle Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Sheridan Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lawrence v. City of RawlinsWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Kipp v. AgeeWyoming Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API