Johnson v. State

The appellant, Aundra Johnson (“Johnson”), appeals his conviction and sentence for fleeing a police officer.1 For the following reasons, we affirm.

On appeal, Johnson raises three issues. We find only one argument merits discussion. Johnson contends that the trial judge erred in instructing the jury that the *681law did not permit Mm to read back testimony. Specifically, the trial court instructed the jury as follows:

Now let me caution you regarding the communication, if you want to ask a question regarding the facts, let me caution you that we don’t have I[sic] simultaneous transcript of these…