Cowen v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain Railroad
Supreme Court of Missouri
•Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge
None of the objections urged for a reversal of the judgment in this case were brought to the attention of the court below in a motion for a new trial. No opportunity was allowed for the court to correct its errors, if any it committed. The points now made are that the court erred in admitting a deposition to be read in evidence, and also in giving instructions. The only reasons assigned in the motion for a new trial are that the verdict" is contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the same was for the plaintiff when it should have been for the defendant. The questions raised here were…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Baker v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Danforth v. Lindell Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Gaines v. FenderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Carver v. ThornhillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Howard v. StrodeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.