Legal Opinion

People v. Bigus

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (115 AD2d 751). Unlike People v Briggins (50 NY2d 302), there was here a fraudulent intent.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BrigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. BigusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. DeRueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. State v. BedoniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Thornton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API