Legal Opinion
People v. Dunbar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from his conviction of assault in the third degree, defendant argues that he was denied his consti*1007tutional right to be present at a critical stage of his trial when the court entertained his Sandoval motion (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) in chambers. Following the discussion in chambers in which defendant’s attorney participated, the court placed its Sandoval ruling on the record and, although defendant objected to the ruling, defendant raised no objection to the court’s discussing the motion in chambers without his presence.
Because…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. DunlapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. FavorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. LomackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.