Legal Opinion
United States v. McQuagge
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided March 9, 1992No. 6:91 CR 57PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUSTICE, District Judge.
Defendants, Thomas Clyde McQuagge, Jr. and Karl Briceland McCurdy, have moved to suppress evidence, arguing that it was obtained in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights, because the evidence obtained was the fruit of an illegal arrest. In addition, defendant McCurdy has moved to suppress statements made to a law enforcement officer, as obtained in violation of his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination. Hearings were held on these motions on October 22, 1991 and October 28, 1991. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the motions…
2Cases cited118 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Acosta-ColonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Kevin C. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Reginald K. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Cheryl Lea PopeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.