Legal Opinion

Dziedzic v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine sample twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. The misbehavior report and positive test results provide substantial evidence in support of the determination of guilt (see Matter of Giraldi v Selsky,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frazier v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Harris v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Giraldi v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniels v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Adams v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Connelly v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API