Graham v. Jones
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentO’Niell, Chief Justice
After a constitutional amendment has been proposed and submitted to the people by a vote of not less' than two-thirds of the members elected to each house of the Legislature, and after the amendment has been adopted by a majority of the people voting in a general election held throughout the State, no court of justice should have authority to annul the amendment on the ground that there was an error or omission in the procedure preceding the submission of the amendment to the people, or on the ground that the amendment should have been proposed and adopted in the form of two or more…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- In Re DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- State ex rel. Hudd v. TimmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.