McIntyre v. City of Rochester
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Jessie McIntyre brought this action pro se in June 2016, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Rochester (“City”) and two “John Doe” defendants. After the City moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Dkt. # 5), plaintiff, through newly-retained counsel, filed an amended complaint (Dkt. # 8). The City has not moved against or otherwise responded to the amended complaint.
The City’s motion to dismiss is based on its arguments that the original…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Cole v. Stephen Einstein & Assocs., P.C.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Everdry Mktg. & Mgmt., Inc. v. Delves & Giufre Enters., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Benford v. Milwaukee Electric Tool CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020
- Benford v. Milwaukee Electric Tool CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020
- Johnson v. Allegiance Speciality Hospita of Greenville, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.