Legal Opinion
Auwood v. Harry Brandt Booking Office, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 21, 1986No. Civ. N-79-144 (PCD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for judgment based on the verdict rendered on June 18, 1986, and for an order declaring that the amount received in previous settlements with other co-conspirators should not be used to offset the jury verdict. Defendants argue that (1) judgment based on the verdict should not enter on the ground that plaintiffs have failed to prove actual damages but that if judgment is entered it should be in the amount of $1.00; and (2) that prior settlements should be deducted from the judgment and from any award of attorney…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Auwood v. Harry Brandt Booking Office, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- United States Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- William Auwood v. Harry Brandt Booking Office, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988