Legal Opinion
Weber v. Climax Molybdenum Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeeger, J.
The facts will be covered in the findings and it is not necessary to discuss them here to any great extent. It is sufficient to state that the action is based upon a contract in writing which bears date the 20th day of November, 1916, made by and between *472Edward G. Heckendorf, and the defendant American Metal Company, Limited, in and by which said Heckendorf agreed to sell to the defendant metal company a certain option agreement, called the Leal option, covering several mining properties in Colorado, and also to make such further locations in the vicinity thereof as might be agreed upon and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Pollitz v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Holmes v. CampAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Hanna v. . LyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Lighton v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Turner v. American Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Wile v. Burns Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Weber v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926