McKaig v. McKaig
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The action is in ejectment. The complaint sets out ownership in fee by the plaintiff of the premises in question, and alleges that “ the defendant unlawfully and without permission from the plaintiff has entered upon said premises and is now in the possession thereof, although plaintiff duly notified her to vacate said premises, by serving upon her a written notice to vacate.” This notice was directed to the defendant as follows: “ Take Notice, that I hereby terminate your tenancy of premises known as 300 East Quaker St., Orchard Park, N. Y., and require you to remove therefrom on or before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Butler v. . Frontier Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Manning v. . ManningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Wood v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Martin v. . RectorNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Minier v. MinierNew York Supreme Court · 1870
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosenstiel v. RosenstielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Steinberg v. MonaschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Slansky v. SlanskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Stickler v. HALEVYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Milner v. Milner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1960