Legal Opinion

Hamlin v. Rogers, Worsham & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Contracts. Fertilizers. Evidence. Before Judge Harris. City Court of Macon. March Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

This was a suit on a note given for the price of fertilizers sold by the plaintiffs to the defendant; and besides the statutory warranty that the fertilizer comes up to the chemical analysis branded on the sacks, the note contained a stipulation that the seller should not be responsible for practical results, or for the effect off the fertilizer upon crops. To this suit the defendant pleaded that the. articles sold did not contain the elements and ingredients indicated by the analysis, and that the sacks in which it was packed, although branded, were not tagged. On the trial,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Jackson v. Langston & CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  3. De Loach v. Hardee's Son & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Jones v. Cordele Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Scott v. GillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Scott & Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Hillis v. Comer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API