Legal Opinion
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
' NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Loo, Merideth & McMillan appeals from a district court order declaring that appellant had violated a permanent injunction issued by the district court against any transfer of the assets of Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc. (“Co Petro”). The district court ordered appellant to return $60,000 it had received from Co Petro. Appellant contends (1) that the district court did not have jurisdiction to issue the order, (2) that the district court proceeding was automatically stayed under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, 11 U.S.C. § 362 (Supp. IV 1980),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Turman v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Financial Group of TexasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re BenalcazarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Chao v. Hospital Staffing Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Commodity Futures Trading Com'n v. Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Elmas Trading Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1985
- Bilzerian v. Securities & Exchange Commission (In Re Bilzerian)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.