Legal Opinion
American Red Ball International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 28, 2007No. 07-211CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
The Department of Defense contracts with private companies to provide support for military personnel and their families when assigned to new duty stations. These moving companies are qualified by the Government based on a series of Department of Defense regulations. One of these regulations states that movers must declare any common ownership, because commonly owned movers cannot bid on contracts in the same geographical area. See DOD 4500.9-R.
Plaintiffs in this case were separate and independent corporations until 1993, when they declared common ownership…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Placeway Construction Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Felix E. Perez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Environmental Solutions Business Division v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Taylor Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Keeter Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Cebe Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Woodies Holdings, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014