Park Amusement Co. v. McCaughn
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
This cause concerns itself with the construction of the revenue statute of 1917, and more particularly section 209 (Comp. St. § 6336%j). The pertinent features of the act are that it imposes a flat rate tax of 8 per cent, upon all corporations which have “no invested capital or not more than a nominal capital,” and a graduated scale rate upon others. The case is heard in the form of a rule fo? a new trial, but really as a case stated, the facts not being in controversy, and a verdict having been perfunctorily directed as one way of raising the question of law…
2Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Secretary of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- FEEDERS'SUPPLY CO. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Fuller & Smith v. RoutzahnDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1927
- Alexander & Garrett v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1927
- Strayer's Business College, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.