Legal Opinion

Erdmann v. Henderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1957No. 33720PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Prior to 1939, plaintiffs owned a tract of land. The trial court found that plaintiffs

“ . . . by inheritance, purchase and easement, secured possession and ownership of all the water system lying within the boundaries of the Sutherland estate.”

In 1939, plaintiffs sold a portion of the tract to Louis J. Brautlacht. The parties entered into an agreement that (a) recognized plaintiffs’ ownership of the water system located on plaintiffs’ land and (b) permitted Mr. Brautlacht

“. . . to connect with said water system and to take therefrom sufficient water for domestic use of one dwelling house…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malnati v. RamsteadWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Fairview Lumber Co. v. MakosWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Dux v. HostetterWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. White v. PaqueWashington Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nerbun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. Tilly v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Spino v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. Gattavara v. ScheumannWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API