Massee v. Thompson
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Nelson
specially concurs and dissents.
¶65 I concur in the analysis and in the result of our Opinion with one exception. I disagree with our application of the judicially-created public duty doctrine. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from that portion of our Opinion.
¶66 This case directly raises the question of whether the abolition of sovereign immunity under Article II, Section 18 of the Montana Constitution precludes application of the judicially-created public duty doctrine. We have declined to address this argument in favor of simply applying the public duty doctrine. I would hold that this…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Fowler v. RobertsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.