Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 2, 1934No. Docket No. 65158Published

The petitioner, a resident of Massachusetts, borrowed certain sums of money from his wife, also a resident of Massachusetts, agreeing to repay the sums borrowed and also to pay her interest thereon. The agreement was subsequently evidenced by an interest-bearing promissory note given by the petitioner to his wife.

Read the full summary

The petitioner, a resident of Massachusetts, borrowed certain sums of money from his wife, also a resident of Massachusetts, agreeing to repay the sums borrowed and also to pay her interest thereon. The agreement was subsequently evidenced by an interest-bearing promissory note given by the petitioner to his wife. Held, that the interest paid during the taxable year by the petitioner to his wife pursuant to their agreement is an allowable deduction in determining his net income.

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL SHAPIRO, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Shapiro v. Commissioner

Docket No. 65158.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 1012; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1445;

February 2, 1934, Promulgated

The petitioner, a resident of Massachusetts, borrowed certain sums of money from his wife, also a resident of Massachusetts, agreeing to repay the sums borrowed and also to pay her interest thereon. The agreement was subsequently evidenced by an interest-bearing promissory note given by the petitioner to his wife. Held, that the interest paid during the taxable year by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shapiro v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API