Legal Opinion

Mastin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1928No. 347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

28 F.2d 748 (1928)

MASTIN

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 347.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

September 29, 1928.

Charles M. Howell, of Kansas City, Mo. (Daniel V. Howell, of Kansas City, Mo., James Hagerman, Jr., of Washington, D. C., and Joseph S. Brooks, of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for petitioner.

L. W. Scott, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue (Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., C. M. Charest, General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., and Harvey R. Gamble, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before VAN VALKENBURGH…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. FlannerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Duffy v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Avery v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. Helvering v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API