Legal Opinion

United States v. Addison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2002No. 01-10536; D.C. No. CR-93-00098-VRWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM***

Appellant Curtis Addison (“Addison”) contests his conviction and sentence for *464possession of cocaine with intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)), possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)), and felon in possession of a firearm (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)), arguing ineffective assistance of counsel. Even if Addison could demonstrate ineffective assistance, he is foreclosed from relief as we previously decided that he would have been convicted even if agent Metaxas’s testimony had been excluded. See United States v. Addison, 46 F.3d 1145, 1995 WL…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Richard Lee Scrivner, AKA Richard Lee ScrivnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Pens. Plan Guide P 23908wCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States of America v. Curtis A. AddisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Addison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API