Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Grant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 22, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, in the two cases which were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The damage for which appellees sued was for the killing of a number of mules belonging to them caused by the operation of appellant’s train.

The occurrence out of which comes this litigation happened about eight o’clock p. m. on the 23d of August, 1930, on a straight stretch of appellant’s line of railway a short distance south of where the railway crossed the floodway of Drainage District No. 7 in Poinsett County, Arkansas, and not near or at a crossing.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. LandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  2. Railway Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  3. L. R. & Ft. S. Railway v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MinorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. McCrossenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Old Republic Insurance Company v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Hildebrand v. Chicago B. & Q. R. R.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Old Republic Insurance Company v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API