Gastel v. Bridges
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This motion for leave to appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court, affirming an order of the City Court of Rochester, should be denied.
There is no inherent right to appeal. That right depends upon express constitutional or statutory authorization (Friedman v State of New York, 24 NY2d 528, 535, mot to amend remittitur granted 25 NY2d 905, lv dismissed 397 US 317); it may not be inferred by implication or construction (Johnson v International Harvester Co., 236 App Div 618). CPLR 5703 (b) authorizes appeals to this court as of right from an order of a County Court…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Swartz v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Harding v. New York State Teamsters Council Welfare Trust FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Harding v. New York State Teamsters Council Welfare Trust FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Johnson v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Noghrey v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- OneWest Bank FSB v. PerlaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Town of Cicero v. Lakeshore Estates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Tripodi v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community SupervisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- O'Fennell Corp. v. O'Fennell's of Pine Hill, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.