Legal Opinion

John Patrick Tully v. Edward Scheu, United States Marshal for the District of New Jersey, and William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 26, 1979No. 79-1113PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

A New Jersey court rule provides that a criminal defendant may move for reduction of sentence within sixty days after judgment of conviction and that the sentencing judge may reduce the sentence within seventy-five days from the date of judgment “and not thereafter.” 1 This appeal by a state prisoner from a denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 requires us to decide whether New Jersey denied appellant rights assured by the sixth and fourteenth amendments to the Constitution under circumstances in which he timely moved for reduction…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Utt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. State v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Guajardo v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. GiorgianniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Tully v. ScheuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API