Legal Opinion

Marjorie A. Hall, of the Estate of William G. Hall, State of Tennessee, Intervenor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1994No. 93-5779Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

This is a federal estate tax case that involves a will executed in 1978. The will contained a provision íeaving the testator’s wife an amount equal 1 to the maximum marital deduction allowed by federal law. After the will was signed, the then-existing limits on the marital deduction were removed by the Economic Recovery and Tax Act of 1981 (“ERTA”). The testator died two years later without having changed his will.

Under a “transitional rule” contained in § 403(e)(3) of ERTA, the liberalized marital deduction is not available in a situation such as this unless…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Liberty National Bank & Trust Company, Estate of Terry H. Fischer, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Bob Hindes and Wife, Dorothy Lee Hindes v. United States of America, United States of America v. Bob Hindes and Wife, Dorothy Lee HindesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Old Kent Bank And Trust Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  5. Hall v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API