Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Pratt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1953No. 12549PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is a' railroad crossing collision case. Appellant, Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway Company, brought suit against Charles Delbert Pratt for damages to its train, eqúipment and tracks, occasioned by the collision. Pratt filed a cross-action for personal injuries and damages to his truck, and, after a jury trial, was awarded a judgment of $8,500, despite jury findings that he was guilty of negligence in numerous particulars. The theory of recovery was the doctrine of discovered peril. The applicability of such doctrine under the facts of this case, and the sufficiency…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ford v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BreadowTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. ShetterTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Texas & N. O. R. v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. McFerrinTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. RT Herrin Petroleum Transport Co. v. ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. of Texas v. McFerrinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Elena Castilleja v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. PANHANDLE & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. LiscombCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API