Cocke v. Edwards

The judgment for plaintiff ' concluded questions pertaining alone to plaintiff’s right of recovery. Jones v. Woodward Iron Co., 203 Ala. 66, 82 So. 26; Randle v. B. R. L. & P. Co., 169 Ala. 314, 53 So. 918. It was a judgment for the plaintiff.

The motion for new trial was predicated on the inadequacy of the damages in view of the undisputed evidence that the actual damages and reasonable repair bills caused by the collision were largely in excess of that returned by the jury.

In Ætna Accident Ins. Co. v. B. R. L. & P. Co., 198 Ala. 72, 73 So. 383, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the…