Winborn Ex Rel. Estate of Winburn v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentBussey, Justice
(dissenting) :
Being convinced that there was reversible error in more than one particular, I most respectfully dissent. It is elementary that in the consideration of a motion for a directed verdict by a defendant, all of the evidence and the inferences reasonably deducible therefrom have to be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. It is also well settled *579that where an insurer seeks to avoid liability under a policy on the ground of contended fraud in the application, the burden is upon such insurer to prove such affirmative defense by clear and convincing evidence. See numerous…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Huestess v. South Atlantic Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Johnson v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Atlantic Life Insurance v. BeckhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Stoddard v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
- Smiley v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance SocietySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967