Legal Opinion · Dissent

Andrea Leigh Taylor v. Thomas Roy Taylor, Jr.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2016No. 2015-CA-00105-SCTPublished

1Dissent

KING, JUSTICE,

DISSENTING:

¶8. The chancellor in this case entered a judgment in favor of Austin, a nonparty, for the future repayment of his studént loans. Because I believe that Austin was a necessary party to the action, I dissent. Andrea argues that the trial court erred by entering a judgment in favor of Austin, who was not a party to the action. All parties testified that Austin knowingly and voluntarily took out student loans to pay for the high cost of the aviation program at Delta State. Andrea testified that “Austin was aware that he would be responsible for paying for the [student…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. TedderMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. McDaniel v. RitterMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hambrick v. PrestwoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Lawrence v. LawrenceMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. PERS OF MS v. HawkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API