Commonwealth v. Pollock
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHudock, Judge
I join in the disposition of all of the issues raised on appeal save one. While I, like the majority, would affirm the judgment of sentence imposed upon Appellant for the § 4901 conviction, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the § 4941(a) conviction. I believe the disposition of that conviction is controlled by our Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Austin, 500 Pa. 620, 459 A.2d 336 (1983).
In Austin, supra, Austin had obtained a permit to haul an oversized and overweight load, i.e., a bulldozer. In transit, however, he violated several safety regulations…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AustinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. J.F. Lomma, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MercerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. LiverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987