Legal Opinion

Ohlendiek v. Schuler

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1929No. 4987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

Appeal from decree dismissing the bill on the merits. The bill, sustained by this court in 299 F. 182, as against a motion to dismiss, alleg-es as follows: Defendants aro the beneficiaries of the will made in 1908 of one lioetteher, a resident of Cincinnati, owning real and personal property there. For years preceding his death in 1920, he had lived in Germany, being supported and nursed by plaintiff in consideration of Ms promise to pay therefor; this promise he was unable to perform while Ms property remained in the possession of the Alien Property Custodian. Finally,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edwall v. JessephWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kopp v. ReiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Swain v. BurnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Allis v. JonesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1891
  5. Markham v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamilton Foundry & MacHine Co. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers Union of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  2. Brooks v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Woolley v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Levi v. MurrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. Tennessee Enamel Mfg. Co. v. Stoves, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API