Legal Opinion · Concurrence

James v. Galetka

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 3, 1998No. 961767-CAPublished

1ConcurrenceBench, Judge

Contrary to the position taken in the main opinion, the issue of whether criminal statutes of limitations are jurisdictional is not an issue of first impression in Utah. We have already stated that criminal statutes of limitations are jurisdictional in nature. See, e.g., State v. Price, 837 P.2d 578, 582-84 (Utah Ct.App.1992) (holding statutory limit on time for filing motion to withdraw guilty plea is jurisdictional); State v. Pierce, 782 P.2d 194, 196 (Utah Ct.App.1989) (holding criminal statute of limitations is jurisdictional bar to prosecution). The majority’s approach is, at a minimum,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kenneth E. Waters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Ringwood v. Foreign Auto Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. United States v. Cathy CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API