Legal Opinion
City of Flat River v. Edgar
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1967No. 32479PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, Commissioner.
In this condemnation proceeding a nine-man verdict for $4000 in favor of defendant-landowner was returned and judgment was entered thereon. A hearing was had upon defendant’s motion for a new trial at which defendant adduced evidence in support of two of her assignments of error, namely,
“14. Because two members of the jury were members of a religious sect constitutionally opposed to serving on a jury and had been advised by the leaders of their sect or church not to serve on the jury, and because said jurors refused to take a part in the deliberations and simply…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lee v. Baltimore Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Piehler Ex Rel. Schultz v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Reich v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Romandel v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Sadlon v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wingate Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Lester E. Cox Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Schabe v. Hampton Bays Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Waldman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Hunt v. Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.