Legal Opinion

City of Flat River v. Edgar

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1967No. 32479PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Commissioner.

In this condemnation proceeding a nine-man verdict for $4000 in favor of defendant-landowner was returned and judgment was entered thereon. A hearing was had upon defendant’s motion for a new trial at which defendant adduced evidence in support of two of her assignments of error, namely,

“14. Because two members of the jury were members of a religious sect constitutionally opposed to serving on a jury and had been advised by the leaders of their sect or church not to serve on the jury, and because said jurors refused to take a part in the deliberations and simply…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. Baltimore Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Piehler Ex Rel. Schultz v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Reich v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Romandel v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Sadlon v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wingate Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Lester E. Cox Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Schabe v. Hampton Bays Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Waldman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Hunt v. Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API