Legal Opinion

Atlantic Greyhound Corporation v. Raymond J. Frank

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 26, 1960No. 15516PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

At the first trial of this negligence action, plaintiff obtained a $30,000 jury verdict which the District Court found excessive. It ordered a new trial unless plaintiff would accept a $15,000 remit-titur. D.C., 172 F.Supp. 190 (1959). The plaintiff chose a new trial which resulted in a $35,000 verdict. The defendant then moved to have that verdict set aside and for a third trial.

In the course of oral argument thereon, the^trial judge clearly indicated that he thought the second verdict was also excessive. But it is equally clear that, at the close of the argument, he reserved decision by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shelby v. Williams and Horney Livestock, Incorporated v. Joseph E. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  2. Frank v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1959
  3. Frank v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Princemont Construction Corp. v. A. D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Herman v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API