Legal Opinion

United States v. Hansel

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided March 25, 1999No. 96-CV-0775Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER

MCAVOY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff United States of America (“plaintiff’) commenced an action against defendants pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 7401 and 7403 to reduce tax assessments to judgment against Sheldon Hansel and to set aside certain alleged fraudulent conveyances of stock to Defendants Christy, Grant, Shelley, and Hope Hansel. 1 By Memorandum — Decision & Order dated March 14, 1998, familiarity with which is assumed, see United States v. Hansel, 999 F.Supp. 694 (N.D.N.Y.1998), the Court granted summary judgment against Sheldon, Christy, Grant and Shelley Hansel. 2…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Prisco v. A & D Carting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
Anderson v. . BloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
Farm Stores, Inc. v. School Feeding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
Pershall v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
United States v. HanselDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.